The Board of Trustees did not appoint Carlos Cortez as the next chancellor as was expected and even announced.
https://www.inglesidelight.com/city-college-leaders-chancellor-contract/
The Ingleside Light quotes Mary Bravewoman, whose job it is to slant things so it appears that the faculty are in agreement when they are not. I believe in unions, but of course they're a political body.
Last night at the Board of Trustees meeting this is what she said:
"You've already heard from us, this college community, and the number of people that are standing back there. Multiply them by tens. They represent the entire college community. And we have been waiting for months," Bravewoman said. "This is an embarrassment."
Bravewoman continued, "I don't understand why there is a lack of leadership and direction. We have a clear choice in front of us. You heard from the community, you heard from students, you heard from faculty. What the actual fuck is the hold up? This is an embarrassment."
I certainly haven't kept up on this. I didn't even realize that Anita Martinez, not Alan Wong, was the current president of the board.
This final statement in the article stunned me!
The new chancellor is expected to stabilize the school's finances and increase the number of students served.
Stabilizing the school's finances is what Chancellor Bailey was blamed for. The new chancellor is expected to side with the union.